Screeners are the least interesting source, and the one everybody starts with.
Finding stocks to buy is a separate skill from analysing them. Most investors start with a screener, which returns companies matching criteria you already chose, so it can only surface what you already knew to look for. The better sources produce candidates a screen would never return.
A screener applies your filters to a database. That makes it excellent at finding companies matching a hypothesis you already hold and incapable of generating the hypothesis. Everyone running the same popular filters gets the same list, which is the opposite of an edge.
It remains useful, and it belongs second rather than first. The five sources below produce candidates worth screening, in roughly ascending order of how much work they take and how well they repay it.
The cheapest edge available to an individual is knowing an industry from the inside. If you work in logistics, healthcare or software, you already understand who is winning and why in a way no screener reports. Peter Lynch's version of this is overquoted and still correct: the advantage is not the tip, it is the context you have that the market does not price efficiently.
A filter for low P/E reliably surfaces companies whose earnings are about to fall. Screen instead for the characteristics of a good business: ROIC above 15% sustained, stable or expanding gross margin, positive and growing free cash flow, and a share count that is not rising. Apply valuation afterwards, as a test rather than a search.
Every business you admire buys from someone and sells to someone. Those suppliers and customers are often less followed, and the reasons the original company is good frequently apply to them. Segment disclosure in a 10-K names the largest customers, which is a free list of candidates nobody screened for.
A screener describes the present. Most opportunity sits in transitions: a company crossing into operating leverage, a first year of positive free cash flow, a moat widening. Screening for the change rather than the level surfaces companies before the market has finished repricing them.
Most good businesses are not attractively priced most of the time. The discipline is to research first, decide what you would pay, write it down, and wait. A list of twenty companies you understand with a price attached to each is worth more than a screen you run when you happen to have cash.
Four filters, chosen so that passing all of them is difficult and meaningful.
ROIC > 15% for five consecutive years
Gross margin flat or rising over five years
Free cash flow positive in each of the last three years
Diluted share count flat or falling over five years
This returns a short list, and almost everything on it will be a genuinely good business. Notice that none of the four mentions price. Valuation comes after you have decided the company is worth owning, which is the sequence that stops the price from writing your thesis.
Finding is the easy half. Every name from every source above still needs the same work: understand the business, establish its lifecycle phase, test the moat, judge management, then value it. That is the seven-step framework, and the ordering matters more than the sources do.
Finding a name is the easy half. Phase Check reads any US-listed company's financials, places it on the lifecycle and names the metric that decides it, which is the fastest way to tell whether a candidate is worth the full analysis.
Try Phase Check freeNo credit card. One check without an account, unlimited with a free one.
Stock Simplifier walks you through these steps for any stock, filling in real data at every one and explaining each concept as it comes up. You review it, score it, and reach your own conclusion. Every analysis is saved so you can check later whether your thesis still holds.
Free forever. No credit card · Upgrade anytime.